Has radiometric dating ever been wrong

posted by | Leave a comment

That data is lacking from Austin's published works.Besides, this line of argument does not address the fact that the result is a known and expected behavior of isochrons.The walls of the canyon are mostly cut into horizontal rock layers of Paleozoic age (green in Figure 1, above).There is an angular unconformity at the bottom of the Paleozoic layers.The ICR's Grand Canyon Dating Project does not strike a telling blow against the reliability of isochron dating.The conditions which caused the "false isochron" in this case are fairly well-understood, and easy to avoid by proper sample selection.

has radiometric dating ever been wrong-88

It also be the age of the flows, but it does not have to be.Further, there is no material in Austin's book which legitimizes the false and misleading claims in his articles (which are free and available online) receive much wider distribution than Austin's book (which costs ).The Shroud of Turin, a linen cloth that tradition associates with the crucifixion and burial of Jesus, has undergone numerous scientific tests, the most notable of which is radiocarbon dating, in an attempt to determine the relic's authenticity. Shredding the samples would not solve the problem, while making it much more difficult and wasteful to clean the samples properly.He didn't pretend that the age of the flows was the expected result, and he didn't make the false claim that his result was sufficient to call all isochron dating into question.This is a transparent attempt to place a GSA "seal of approval" on Austin's unsupportable The length of the medium is not a legitimate excuse for a blatant falsehood (the claim that Austin set out to "test" Rb/Sr dating) or for the shenanigans involving the sampling technique versus the expected meaning of the resulting age.

Leave a Reply

method of documenting tracking and updating software licenses